tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951375.post116173991228356930..comments2023-10-03T10:31:50.038-04:00Comments on Magmasystems Blog: Funny Codemarchttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09487180059998380922noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951375.post-1161878539593895412006-10-26T12:02:00.000-04:002006-10-26T12:02:00.000-04:00So what does the Unit test look like for this bit ...So what does the Unit test look like for this bit of nasty code ????????Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951375.post-1161771176270480122006-10-25T06:12:00.000-04:002006-10-25T06:12:00.000-04:00Believe me ... it had nothing to do with anything ...Believe me ... it had nothing to do with anything that required thought ...marchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09487180059998380922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951375.post-1161747800169621042006-10-24T23:43:00.000-04:002006-10-24T23:43:00.000-04:00Actually looks a bit familiar. If there was some c...Actually looks a bit familiar. If there was some code in the block I'd guess it was used to fix a debug breakpoint that the optimizer couldnt eliminate. I used to do things like that in the early days of C programming.<BR/><BR/>i.e.<BR/><BR/>if (this == null) <B> // set break here </B><BR/>{<BR/> this = null; <B> // never called </B><BR/>}<BR/><BR/><BR/>-craigAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com