tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951375.post4710245756472076458..comments2023-10-03T10:31:50.038-04:00Comments on Magmasystems Blog: Looking at ACEmarchttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09487180059998380922noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951375.post-9126583194263085002007-06-18T08:49:00.000-04:002007-06-18T08:49:00.000-04:00New IBM entrant? Link please?Also, I know that Len...New IBM entrant? Link please?<BR/><BR/>Also, I know that Len Holgate is commercializing his socket-based commns framework. Wonder if that will be a competitor to ACE?<BR/><BR/>My client-side .NET framework has adapters for .NET sockets, EMS, and MSMQ. I was looking for a high-performance replacement for .NET sockets (mainly for Algo and HFT apps), hence the interest in ACE. However, you would marchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09487180059998380922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951375.post-44633432852243134792007-06-18T08:42:00.000-04:002007-06-18T08:42:00.000-04:00If you're looking for a robust sockets & threading...If you're looking for a robust sockets & threading abstraction to build servers from the ground up in C++, ACE is the way to go.<BR/><BR/>But why build from such a low level ? Can't you use some pub/sub infra like TIB Rendezvous, SmartSockets, 29West or the new IBM entrant ?JohnOShttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13793765396114911327noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5951375.post-30372349748147016572007-06-17T13:41:00.000-04:002007-06-17T13:41:00.000-04:00I wouldnt recommend ACE its kind of old style in i...I wouldnt recommend ACE its kind of old style in its design and C++ usage its a large library to bring on. Are there any specific parts or functionality youre out after, there might be better alternatives available.<BR/><BR/>/MAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com